Difference between revisions of "SQL injection/Target Environments/Compatibility"
(Created page with "For compatibility purposes it is important to be mindful of what functions, environment variables, and tables are ubiquitous. When writing an automated attack tool, it is conven...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | <noinclude>:<font size="-2">[[SQL injection]] > [[SQL injection/Target Environments|Target Environments]] > Compatibility</font></noinclude> | ||
+ | |||
For compatibility purposes it is important to be mindful of what functions, environment variables, and tables are ubiquitous. When writing an automated attack tool, it is convenient to be able to use the same function in each SQL dialect, rather than choosing a function or variable per sql version. | For compatibility purposes it is important to be mindful of what functions, environment variables, and tables are ubiquitous. When writing an automated attack tool, it is convenient to be able to use the same function in each SQL dialect, rather than choosing a function or variable per sql version. | ||
Line 18: | Line 20: | ||
===Capabilities=== | ===Capabilities=== | ||
{{SQL injection/Target Environments/Compatibility/Capabilities}} | {{SQL injection/Target Environments/Compatibility/Capabilities}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <noinclude><div style="padding-top:5px; padding-bottom:5px; border-top:1px solid; border-bottom:1px solid; display:inline-block;">'''Currently viewing''' [[SQL injection]] > [[SQL injection/Target Environments|Target Environments]] > Mapping</div></noinclude> |
Revision as of 02:19, 19 July 2012
- SQL injection > Target Environments > Compatibility
For compatibility purposes it is important to be mindful of what functions, environment variables, and tables are ubiquitous. When writing an automated attack tool, it is convenient to be able to use the same function in each SQL dialect, rather than choosing a function or variable per sql version.
- Additional similarities are added each update to the various database engines. Read the manuals for the affected engines to get an up-to-date view.
- Not all similarities or differences are documented here, only those relevant to SQL injection.
- Similarities and differences between database engines include table and column names, function names, environment variables, and statement syntax.
There are enough similarities that it is possible to have a degree of universal exploitation.
Information_schema
All of the databasing engines that presently have an information_schema collection have the following in common:
- The information_schema.tables table has a table_name column.
- The information_schema.columns table has both table_name and column_name columns.
- All of them have information_schema.routines and information_schema.schemata tables.
These database engines include PostgreSQL, MySQL, and MSSQL.
Functions & environment variables
Similarities between the different engines
MS SQL, MySQL, and PostgreSQL share the following:
- ascii()
- substring()
- count()
- lower()
- upper()
- BETWEEN ... AND ... conditional operator
MySQL and Postgres share the following:
- current_database()
- version()
- current_user
- LIMIT ... OFFSET ... clause syntax
MySQL and MSSQL share the following:
- database()
- @@version
- RLIKE clause for regular expressions
Other syntax
All of the databases share the same comparison operators, basic SELECT, WHERE, GROUP, and ORDER syntax. PostgreSQL and MySQL now also share the same LIMIT syntax}}
LIMIT [COUNT] offset [ROW TO START at] |
Microsoft SQL does not have a LIMIT clause. In stead, sub-queries with SELECT TOP and ORDER BY clauses are used as a workaround. This makes for a less readable query and a more frustrating attack.
SELECT top 1 $column FROM (SELECT top $OFFSET $column FROM $table [WHERE clause] [GROUP BY clause] ORDER BY $column DESC) sq [GROUP BY clause] ORDER BY $column ASC |
Capabilities
Template:SQL injection/Target Environments/Compatibility/Capabilities