Questions about this topic? Sign up to ask in the talk tab.
Difference between revisions of "Unsafe command processing"
From NetSec
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Proof of concept: | Proof of concept: | ||
| − | + | {{code|text=<source lang="python"> >>> os.system("echo %s" % input("# "))</source> | |
| − | # unsafe; ping -c1 google.com | + | <source lang="bash"># unsafe; ping -c1 google.com |
PING google.com (74.125.224.168) 56(84) bytes of data. | PING google.com (74.125.224.168) 56(84) bytes of data. | ||
| − | 64 bytes from lax02s01-in-f8.1e100.net (74.125.224.168): icmp_req=1 ttl=51 time=13.1 ms | + | 64 bytes from lax02s01-in-f8.1e100.net (74.125.224.168): icmp_req=1 ttl=51 time=13.1 ms</source>}} |
Mitigation: | Mitigation: | ||
Instead of using system, backticks, popen, exec or any other command executing function, use the language's native built in library. If it does not have one, then write one - but do not simply wrap system() and call this a library; this is bad form. All interpreted languages have a way to load shared libraries (*.so files) and interface with the functions provided by their export tables. These are what should be utilized when authoring libraries that seemingly need you to run a command. Instead, the C interface (CTypes) can be used. | Instead of using system, backticks, popen, exec or any other command executing function, use the language's native built in library. If it does not have one, then write one - but do not simply wrap system() and call this a library; this is bad form. All interpreted languages have a way to load shared libraries (*.so files) and interface with the functions provided by their export tables. These are what should be utilized when authoring libraries that seemingly need you to run a command. Instead, the C interface (CTypes) can be used. | ||
| − | + | Ctype or native examples: | |
| − | + | * Python: | |
{{code|text=<source lang="python">>>> from ctypes import *; cdll.LoadLibrary("libc.so.6").printf(c_char_p("abcdefgh\n")); # import printf() from libc.so.6 | {{code|text=<source lang="python">>>> from ctypes import *; cdll.LoadLibrary("libc.so.6").printf(c_char_p("abcdefgh\n")); # import printf() from libc.so.6 | ||
'abcdefgh'</source>}} | 'abcdefgh'</source>}} | ||
| − | + | * Perl: | |
| − | + | * PHP: | |
| − | + | * Ruby: | |
Auditing: | Auditing: | ||
Revision as of 00:57, 12 May 2013
Unsafe command processing
Using user input as arguments for a system call should never be done. The system() and exec() functions are mostly universal between languages along with the backtick (`) characters for command substitution. In some languages, the $() operator for command substitution is also valid.
Proof of concept:
>>> os.system("echo %s" % input("# ")) # unsafe; ping -c1 google.com PING google.com (74.125.224.168) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from lax02s01-in-f8.1e100.net (74.125.224.168): icmp_req=1 ttl=51 time=13.1 ms |
Mitigation:
Instead of using system, backticks, popen, exec or any other command executing function, use the language's native built in library. If it does not have one, then write one - but do not simply wrap system() and call this a library; this is bad form. All interpreted languages have a way to load shared libraries (*.so files) and interface with the functions provided by their export tables. These are what should be utilized when authoring libraries that seemingly need you to run a command. Instead, the C interface (CTypes) can be used.
Ctype or native examples:
- Python:
>>> from ctypes import *; cdll.LoadLibrary("libc.so.6").printf(c_char_p("abcdefgh\n")); # import printf() from libc.so.6 'abcdefgh' |
- Perl:
- PHP:
- Ruby:
Auditing:
Auditing command processing is simple: check for all uses of system(), exec(), backticks, popen, and any language specific function.
find -type f -regextype posix-awk -regex ".*\.(rb|php|py|pl|pm)" -exec grep -EHnC2 "system\(\|[pP]open\(\|\`\|exec.*\(\|passthru\(" '{}' \; &> command_processing.txt |
