|
|
| (10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | I am a self-taught programmer, I've been coding for several years now and am decently good at it. I code mainly in C/C++ and Python but know several other languages as well. My current project is a C++ fuzzer, if you're interested in the code or want to contribute ping me on IRC under rorschach. I hate talking about myself, so if you want to know more hit me up on IRC. | + | I am a self-taught programmer, I've been coding for several years now and am decently good at it. I code mainly in C/C++ and Python but know several other languages as well. My current project is a Python fuzzing library, if you're interested in helping, please hit me up on IRC! I hate talking about myself, so if you want to know more hit me up on IRC. |
| | + | |
| | + | Contributions: |
| | + | * [[Arp_poisoning_with_scapy|ARP Poisoning With Scapy]] |
| | + | * [[User:Rorschach/Python|Python Talk]] |
| | | | |
| | rorschach | | rorschach |
| − |
| |
| − | Python class logs:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 02:00 < rorschach> ok
| |
| − | 02:00 < rorschach> here goes nothing
| |
| − | 02:01 < rorschach> so if you want to run python there's two ways to do it
| |
| − | 02:01 < rorschach> you can run straight into an interpreter
| |
| − | 02:01 < rorschach> like so
| |
| − | 02:01 < rorschach> rorschach@bastille:~$ python
| |
| − | 02:01 < rorschach> Python 2.6.6 (r266:84292, Dec 26 2010, 22:31:48)
| |
| − | 02:01 < rorschach> [GCC 4.4.5] on linux2
| |
| − | 02:01 < rorschach> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
| |
| − | 02:01 < rorschach> >>> print "test"
| |
| − | 02:01 < rorschach> test
| |
| − | 02:01 < rorschach> >>>
| |
| − | 02:01 < rorschach> or you can input a python file
| |
| − | 02:02 < rorschach> rorschach@bastille:~$ cat test.py
| |
| − | 02:02 < rorschach> print "test"
| |
| − | 02:02 < rorschach> rorschach@bastille:~$ python test.py
| |
| − | 02:02 < rorschach> test
| |
| − | 02:02 < rorschach> rorschach@bastille:~$
| |
| − | 02:02 < rorschach> I find directly into the interpreter handy for testing code or a quick calculator
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | 02:03 < rorschach> to print in python < 3.0 you use 'print "string"'
| |
| − | 02:03 < rorschach> in 3.0 < you use print("string")
| |
| − | 02:03 < rorschach> to declare variables you
| |
| − | 02:03 < rorschach> variable_name = ""
| |
| − | 02:04 < rorschach> you don't state the variable type, and you can dynamically change them
| |
| − | 02:04 < rorschach> >>> test = "test"
| |
| − | 02:04 < rorschach> >>> test = 1
| |
| − | 02:04 < rorschach> >>> print test
| |
| − | 02:04 < rorschach> 1
| |
| − | 02:04 < rorschach> >>>
| |
| − | 02:04 < rorschach> python is reliant on whitespace
| |
| − | 02:05 < rorschach> so instead of braces like in C, you use indentation (or spacing, it doesn't matter as long as it stays the same)
| |
| − | 02:05 < rorschach> so an example of a conditional:
| |
| − | 02:05 < rorschach> >>> if "test" == "test":
| |
| − | 02:05 < rorschach> ... print "test"
| |
| − | 02:05 < rorschach> ... else:
| |
| − | 02:05 < rorschach> ... print "no"
| |
| − | 02:05 < rorschach> ...
| |
| − | 02:05 < rorschach> test
| |
| − | 02:05 < rorschach> >>>
| |
| − | 02:06 < rorschach> (the "..." are added by the interpreter)
| |
| − | 02:06 < ktbonefish> 4 spaces = 1 tab, 1 tab = 1 whitespace generally?
| |
| − | 02:06 < rorschach> no
| |
| − | 02:06 < rorschach> whitespace could be 1 space
| |
| − | 02:06 < rorschach> or it could be 3 tabs
| |
| − | 02:07 < rorschach> it doesn't matter as long as in that block it remains the same
| |
| − | 02:07 < ktbonefish> gotcha
| |
| − | 02:07 < rorschach> example for good measure
| |
| − | 02:07 < rorschach> >>> if "test" == "test":
| |
| − | 02:07 < rorschach> ... print "test"
| |
| − | 02:07 < rorschach> ... else:
| |
| − | 02:07 < rorschach> ... print "no"
| |
| − | 02:07 < rorschach> ...
| |
| − | 02:07 < rorschach> test
| |
| − | 02:07 < rorschach> >>>
| |
| − | 02:07 < rorschach> a while loop would look like:
| |
| − | 02:07 < rorschach> while a < 10:
| |
| − | 02:08 < rorschach> so basically just like in C
| |
| − | 02:08 < rorschach> you can even put () around the statements if that floats your boat
| |
| − | 02:08 < rorschach> while (a < 10):
| |
| − | 02:08 <@p00pi3> which do you primarily use, 2.7? or 3.0? i know they're different, and not many devs seem to like 3.0
| |
| − | 02:08 < rorschach> is valid
| |
| − | 02:08 < rorschach> I use < 3
| |
| − | 02:08 < rorschach> just depends on what the distro comes with
| |
| − | 02:09 < rorschach> I actually usually
| |
| − | 02:09 < rorschach> mv /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/python3; ln -s /usr/bin/python27 /usr/bin/python
| |
| − | 02:09 < rorschach> on a new install if it comes with python3 by default
| |
| − | 02:09 < rorschach> a for loop is where it gets interesting
| |
| − | 02:10 < rorschach> you would
| |
| − | 02:10 < rorschach> (here's an example)
| |
| − | 02:11 < rorschach> >>> # to iterate over a list with a for loop:
| |
| − | 02:11 < rorschach> ...
| |
| − | 02:11 < rorschach> >>> list_a = ("123", "abc", "456", "def")
| |
| − | 02:11 < rorschach> >>> for a in list_a:
| |
| − | 02:11 < rorschach> ... print a
| |
| − | 02:11 < rorschach> ...
| |
| − | 02:11 < rorschach> 123
| |
| − | 02:11 < rorschach> abc
| |
| − | 02:11 < rorschach> 456
| |
| − | 02:11 < rorschach> def
| |
| − | 02:11 < rorschach> >>>
| |
| − | 02:11 < rorschach> actually that's a tuple, but the point remains
| |
| − | 02:12 < rorschach> if you want to declare a tuple or list you would:
| |
| − | 02:12 < rorschach> >>> tuple_a = ()
| |
| − | 02:12 < rorschach> >>> list_b = []
| |
| − | 02:12 < rorschach> >>>
| |
| − | 02:12 < rorschach> an empty one that is
| |
| − | | |
| − | 02:12 < ktbonefish> what is a tuple compared to a list?
| |
| − | 02:12 < rorschach> you can declare them like I did above if you want (probably preferred)
| |
| − | 02:12 < rorschach> umm
| |
| − | 02:13 < rorschach> I think a tuple is an unordered list? but don't take my word for it
| |
| − | 02:13 < rorschach> I'm not totally sure
| |
| − | 02:13 < rorschach> (if someone does know, please jump in)
| |
| − | 02:13 < ctOph13> http://tinyurl.com/tuplevslist
| |
| − | 02:14 < rorschach> http://news.e-scribe.com/397
| |
| − | 02:14 < ctOph13> pretty good description there
| |
| − | 02:14 < rorschach> python also has dictionaries
| |
| − | 02:14 < rorschach> which is a key:value set
| |
| − | 02:15 < rorschach> example:
| |
| − | 02:15 < rorschach> >>> dictionary_a = {"123":1, "abc":2, 3:"567"}
| |
| − | 02:15 < rorschach> >>> print dictionary_a['123']
| |
| − | 02:15 < rorschach> 1
| |
| − | 02:15 < rorschach> >>> print dictionary_a[1]
| |
| − | 02:15 < rorschach> Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
| |
| − | 02:15 < rorschach> KeyError: 1
| |
| − | 02:15 < rorschach> >>> print dictionary_a['abc']
| |
| − | 02:15 < rorschach> 2
| |
| − | 02:15 < rorschach> >>>
| |
| − | 02:16 < rorschach> note that trying to access the value like that triggers an error
| |
| − | 02:16 < rorschach> do dictionaries make sense?
| |
| − | 02:16 < ctOph13> do you need to use double quotes when declaring, and single quotes when accessing?
| |
| − | 02:17 < rorschach> umm
| |
| − | 02:17 < rorschach> pretty sure it doesn't matter
| |
| − | 02:17 < ktbonefish> ^
| |
| − | 02:17 < ctOph13> k
| |
| − | 02:17 < rorschach> double quotes is probably better form though
| |
| − | 02:17 < rorschach> >>> print dictionary_a['abc']
| |
| − | 02:17 < rorschach> 2
| |
| − | 02:17 < rorschach> >>> print dictionary_a["abc"]
| |
| − | 02:17 < rorschach> 2
| |
| − | 02:17 < rorschach> >>>
| |
| − | 02:17 < rorschach> python don't give a shit
| |
| − | 02:17 < rorschach> :3
| |
| − | 02:17 < ctOph13> haha, cool
| |
| − | 02:17 < rorschach> ok
| |
| − | 02:17 < ktbonefish> what about quotes within quotes
| |
| − | 02:17 < ktbonefish> isn't it single has to be outside?
| |
| − | 02:17 < rorschach> for that
| |
| − | 02:17 < rorschach> you could do single quotes (which is easier)
| |
| − | | |
| − | 02:18 < rorschach> or you can \"
| |
| − | 02:18 < rorschach> escape the quote
| |
| − | 02:18 < rorschach> single quotes makes it easier to read though
| |
| − | 02:18 < ktbonefish> k
| |
| − | 02:18 < rorschach> in the for loop example, you may have noticed the "in" operator
| |
| − | 02:19 < rorschach> in a for loop
| |
| − | 02:19 < rorschach> that will iterate through a list / tuple
| |
| − | 02:19 < rorschach> and assign each value to that variable specified
| |
| − | 02:19 < rorschach> so in:
| |
| − | 02:19 < rorschach> for a in tuple_a:
| |
| − | 02:20 < rorschach> each time it iterates a will contain the value of the element
| |
| − | 02:20 < rorschach> that probably doesn't make sense
| |
| − | 02:20 < rorschach> but look at the example of a for loop from above
| |
| − | 02:20 < rorschach> in an if statement
| |
| − | 02:20 < ctOph13> makes sense, kinda like for each statements
| |
| − | 02:20 < rorschach> you can find a substring or an element
| |
| − | 02:20 < rorschach> yeah basically ctOph13
| |
| − | 02:21 < rorschach> so
| |
| − | 02:21 < rorschach> >>> tuple_a = ("123", "abc", "456", "def")
| |
| − | 02:21 < rorschach> >>> if "123" in tuple_a:
| |
| − | 02:21 < rorschach> ... print "\o/"
| |
| − | 02:21 < rorschach> ...
| |
| − | 02:21 < rorschach> \o/
| |
| − | 02:21 < rorschach> >>> string_a = "blahblahtestblah"
| |
| − | 02:21 < rorschach> >>> if "test" in string_a:
| |
| − | 02:21 < rorschach> ... print "\o/"
| |
| − | 02:21 < rorschach> ...
| |
| − | 02:21 < rorschach> \o/
| |
| − | 02:21 < rorschach> >>>
| |
| − | 02:21 < rorschach> get it?
| |
| − | 02:22 < rorschach> it's a very handy operator once you get used to it
| |
| − | 02:22 < rorschach> ok
| |
| − | 02:22 < rorschach> string contatenation can be done with the + operator
| |
| − | 02:23 < rorschach> you can also use += to append to the end
| |
| − | 02:23 < rorschach> >>> string_a = "blahblahtestblah"
| |
| − | 02:23 < rorschach> >>> string_a = "123" + string_a + "test"
| |
| − | 02:23 < rorschach> >>> print string_a
| |
| − | 02:23 < rorschach> 123blahblahtestblahtest
| |
| − | 02:23 < rorschach> >>> string_a += "567"
| |
| − | 02:23 < rorschach> >>> print string_a
| |
| − | 02:23 < rorschach> 123blahblahtestblahtest567
| |
| − | 02:23 < rorschach> >>>
| |
| − | 02:24 < rorschach> if you want to add an int to a string
| |
| − | 02:24 < rorschach> wrap it with str() before you do so
| |
| − | | |
| − | 02:24 < rorschach> >>> string_b = "abc"
| |
| − | 02:24 < rorschach> >>> int_a = 1
| |
| − | 02:24 < rorschach> >>> string_b += str(int_a)
| |
| − | 02:24 < rorschach> >>> print string_b
| |
| − | 02:24 < rorschach> abc1
| |
| − | 02:24 < rorschach> >>>
| |
| − | 02:25 < rorschach> to define a function in python
| |
| − | 02:25 < rorschach> you use
| |
| − | 02:25 < rorschach> def function_name(arg1, arg2):
| |
| − | 02:25 < ktbonefish> question about int to string, can you pull a int out of a string and convert it to such easily?
| |
| − | 02:25 < rorschach> (you don't have to specify a return type, either)
| |
| − | 02:25 < rorschach> yes
| |
| − | 02:26 < rorschach> >>> string_c = "1"
| |
| − | 02:26 < rorschach> >>> int_a = int(string_c)
| |
| − | 02:26 < rorschach> >>> print int_a
| |
| − | 02:26 < rorschach> 1
| |
| − | 02:26 < rorschach> >>>
| |
| − | 02:26 < ktbonefish> gotcha
| |
| − | 02:26 <@mutiny> How does python handle regular expressions?
| |
| − | 02:26 < rorschach> import re
| |
| − | 02:26 < rorschach> re.compile("regular_expression")
| |
| − | 02:26 < mike> you have to important them? @_@
| |
| − | 02:26 < rorschach> http://docs.python.org/library/re.html
| |
| − | 02:26 < rorschach> yeah
| |
| − | 02:27 < rorschach> import is the equivalent of an #include in c
| |
| − | 02:27 < rorschach> for those who don't know
| |
| − | 02:27 < mike> i don't use c
| |
| − | 02:27 < mike> :)
| |
| − | 02:27 < rorschach> :3
| |
| − | 02:27 < rorschach> what do you use?
| |
| − | 02:27 < mike> perl.
| |
| − | 02:28 < rorschach> erm
| |
| − | 02:28 < rorschach> one sec
| |
| − | 02:28 <@mutiny> Perl's engine has regex built in.
| |
| − | 02:28 < mike> yes.
| |
| − | 02:28 < mike> exactly.
| |
| − | 02:28 <@mutiny> mike: A lot of languages didn't have support for regex at first, and were later added into the engine
| |
| − | 02:28 <@mutiny> Anyways, that's off track :3
| |
| − | 02:28 < rorschach> it's like using
| |
| − | 02:28 < rorschach> mike
| |
| − | 02:29 < rorschach> I believe
| |
| − | 02:29 < rorschach> I can't remember what the actually terminology would be
| |
| − | 02:29 < rorschach> :3
| |
| − | 02:29 < rorschach> err "use"
| |
| − | 02:29 < rorschach> ok
| |
| − | 02:29 < rorschach> classes
| |
| − | 02:30 < mike> I would call that use.
| |
| − | 02:30 < rorschach> let me write a quick class
| |
| − | 02:30 <@mutiny> pastebin that code, for ease of use :3
| |
| − | 02:30 <@mutiny> or put it on a wiki page or smth
| |
| − | 02:30 < rorschach> yeah I will
| |
| − | 02:30 < mike> like using a package/module?
| |
| − | 02:30 < rorschach> yeah or a header file
| |
| − | 02:33 < rorschach> http://pastie.org/private/sv4fspthmqu2mggelmw
| |
| − | 02:33 < rorschach> every function in a class has to have the self variable pased to it
| |
| − | 02:34 < rorschach> self contains all of the variables that you want to be accessed by any function in the class
| |
| − | 02:34 < rorschach> but you have to set that variable in self like I did in the class
| |
| − | 02:34 < mike> what's a class?
| |
| − | 02:35 < rorschach> god dammit
| |
| − | 02:35 < rorschach> :3
| |
| − | 02:35 < rorschach> hold on
| |
| − | 02:35 < mike> D: did I miss something
| |
| − | 02:35 < rorschach> no
| |
| − | 02:35 < rorschach> I can't think of a good explanation
| |
| − | 02:35 <@mutiny> He's probably looking up the perl equivalent
| |
| − | 02:35 < rorschach> hold on
| |
| − | 02:35 < mike> It looks like a really complicated array the way you have it set up
| |
| − | 02:36 < rorschach> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_%28computer_programming%29
| |
| − | 02:36 < rorschach> basically
| |
| − | 02:36 < rorschach> fuck
| |
| − | 02:36 < rorschach> I can't explain it
| |
| − | 02:36 < rorschach> :3
| |
| − | 02:36 < rorschach> just read the wikipedia article
| |
| − | 02:37 <@mutiny> a class is an object
| |
| − | 02:37 <@mutiny> that's the tl'dr
| |
| − | 02:37 < rorschach> yeah
| |
| − | 02:37 < rorschach> :3
| |
| − | 02:37 < ctOph13> ^
| |
| − | 02:37 < rorschach> is everyone following so far?
| |
| − | 02:37 < ctOph13> yup
| |
| − | 02:37 < corvus> yes
| |
| − | 02:37 < mike> it's an object that does what
| |
| − | 02:37 < mike> like hashes blew my mind at first
| |
| − | 02:38 < mike> What circumstance would you use a class?
| |
| − | 02:38 <@mutiny> If you don't know what an object is or why they are useful, we may arrange a class specifically to discuss OOP
| |
| − | 02:38 < rorschach> do you need anymore explanation on syntax?
| |
| − | 02:38 < rorschach> anyone?
| |
| − | 02:38 < ctOph13> no looks good
| |
| − | 02:38 < rorschach> mike
| |
| − | 02:38 < rorschach> a class basically contains functions that are only accessible by an instance of that class
| |
| − | 02:38 < rorschach> in this case
| |
| − | 02:38 < rorschach> inst
| |
| − | 02:39 < rorschach> it helps keep the code simple and organized
| |
| − | 02:39 < mike> sort of like a subroutine?
| |
| − | 02:39 < rorschach> you don't have to pass around shit tons of variables
| |
| − | 02:39 < ctOph13> Lets see if I can kind of explain it
| |
| − | 02:39 < ctOph13> Lets say you have a kitchen program
| |
| − | 02:39 < rorschach> since they are all contained in a variable called self that is passed to each function in the class automatically
| |
| − | 02:39 < ctOph13> in the kitchen you have stuff, like a microwave, a fridge, a stove, etc
| |
| − | 02:39 < rorschach> mike: a subroutine is a function
| |
| − | 02:40 < rorschach> :3
| |
| − | 02:40 < ctOph13> each object would be a class, so like a microwave class, a fridge class, etc
| |
| − | 02:40 < mike> so cascading it would be outside a subroutine
| |
| − | 02:40 < ctOph13> because those things have their own properties (size, color, etc) you write them as their own seperate class or object. they can also perform routines/functions/methods
| |
| − | 02:41 < mike> so if you had like a button that you wanted to do things independently
| |
| − | 02:41 < mike> you'd give it a class
| |
| − | 02:41 < ctOph13> right
| |
| − | 02:41 < mike> understood.
| |
| − | 02:41 < ctOph13> a button has a size, color, text
| |
| − | 02:41 < rorschach> but a class can be for anything
| |
| − | 02:41 < ctOph13> ^
| |
| − | 02:42 < rorschach> I am writing a fuzzer
| |
| − | 02:42 < rorschach> and I wrote a class for it
| |
| − | 02:42 < rorschach> that holds all of the functions the fuzzer would need
| |
| − | 02:42 < rorschach> all of the variables, etc
| |
| − | 02:42 < rorschach> which simplifies passing around a shit load of variables to every function that it might not need
| |
| − | | |
| − | 02:43 < rorschach> so within the fuzz class
| |
| − | 02:43 < rorschach> there are functions for socket fuzzing
| |
| − | 02:43 < rorschach> or debugging
| |
| − | 02:43 < rorschach> whatever
| |
| − | 02:43 < rorschach> that I can call when I need to
| |
| − | 02:43 < rorschach> make sense, kinda?
| |
| − | 02:43 < mike> but it won't touch the functions unless the class is called
| |
| − | 02:43 < mike> saves effort
| |
| − | 02:43 < rorschach> (OOP took me a while though)
| |
| − | 02:43 < rorschach> yeah basically
| |
| − | 02:44 < rorschach> ok so now the fun stuff
| |
| − | 02:44 < mike> what are big languages that aren't object oriented?
| |
| − | 02:44 < rorschach> umm
| |
| − | 02:44 < rorschach> C
| |
| − | 02:44 < mike> I thought
| |
| − | 02:44 < mike> okay nevermind
| |
| − | 02:44 < rorschach> C++ is object oriented, but C isn't
| |
| − | 02:44 < mike> thanks lol
| |
| − | 02:44 < mike> oooo kay
| |
| − | 02:44 < mike> got it
| |
| − | 02:44 < rorschach> np
| |
| − | 02:44 < rorschach> other than that, I can't think of any
| |
| − | 02:44 < rorschach> is PHP OOP?
| |
| − | 02:44 < raxen> assembly.
| |
| − | 02:45 < mike> lol assembly
| |
| − | 02:45 < raxen> that is assembly isn't oop as well.
| |
| − | 02:45 < rorschach> assembly
| |
| − | 02:45 <@mutiny> I think most modern languages support OOP, though you always can choose not to use it :3
| |
| − | 02:45 < rorschach> there you go
| |
| − | 02:45 < mike> mutiny: that's what I was thinking.
| |
| − | 02:45 < rorschach> I just barely started using classes
| |
| − | 02:45 < rorschach> and most people call me a masochist because of it
| |
| − | 02:45 < rorschach> :3
| |
| − | 02:46 < ctOph13> haha
| |
| − | 02:46 < rorschach> I also usually code in pure c
| |
| − | 02:46 < rorschach> which also contributes to that title.
| |
| − | 02:46 < rorschach> anywho
| |
| − | 02:46 < rorschach> so there are some good packet capture libraries in python
| |
| − | 02:46 < rorschach> they have libpcap for python
| |
| − | 02:46 < rorschach> but you can also use scapy
| |
| − | 02:47 < rorschach> which can basically do anything
| |
| − | 02:47 < rorschach> here's a script that uses scapy for packet capture that I wrote a while back
| |
| − | 02:48 < rorschach> http://pastebin.com/G0VydTHG
| |
| − | 02:48 < rorschach> you'll see on line 157
| |
| − | 02:48 < rorschach> the sniff() function
| |
| − | 02:48 < rorschach> basically
| |
| − | 02:49 < rorschach> sniff(prn=lambda pkt:takedownParse(pkt, ips), store=0)
| |
| − | 02:49 < rorschach> it tells sniff not to store any packets
| |
| − | 02:49 < rorschach> but everytime it receives one
| |
| − | 02:49 < rorschach> to call takedownParse()
| |
| − | 02:49 < rorschach> and prn= lambda pkt:
| |
| − | 02:49 < rorschach> tells it that the packet is called pkt, so you can call you function and pass the argument
| |
| − | 02:49 < rorschach> which is pretty simple
| |
| − | 02:50 < rorschach> I wrote an icmp chat client with scapy as well
| |
| − | 02:50 < rorschach> https://github.com/v0rbis-dev/ICMP-Chat
| |
| − | 02:51 < rorschach> (this uses a class, too)
| |
| − | 02:51 < rorschach> receive_message() on line 130 is sniffing
| |
| − | 02:52 < rorschach> send_command() on line 140 constructs and sends an icmp packet
| |
| − | 02:52 < rorschach> scapy is confusing at first but it's actually really simple
| |
| − | 02:52 < rorschach> here's the scapy docs http://www.secdev.org/projects/scapy/doc/
| |
| − | 02:52 < rorschach> and there's all sorts of things you can do with it
| |
| − | 02:53 < rorschach> they have tons of examples here http://www.secdev.org/projects/scapy/doc/usage.html#recipes
| |
| − | 02:53 < rorschach> another handy library is ip_addr by google
| |
| − | 02:54 < rorschach> http://code.google.com/p/ipaddr-py/
| |
| − | 02:54 < rorschach> the documentation is here: http://code.google.com/p/ipaddr-py/wiki/Using3144
| |
| − | 02:54 < rorschach> and it's really straight forward
| |
| − | 02:55 < rorschach> but say you want to make a list of every IP address in a given range
| |
| − | 02:55 < rorschach> you can do
| |
| − | 02:55 < rorschach> ipaddr.IPv4Network('192.168.0.1/24')
| |
| − | 02:55 < rorschach> ip_list = ipaddr.IPv4Network('192.168.0.1/24')
| |
| − | 02:55 < rorschach> then you could
| |
| − | 02:55 < rorschach> for ip in ip_list:
| |
| − | 02:55 < rorschach> print ip
| |
| − | 02:55 < rorschach> or do some kind of scan for every IP whatever
| |
| − | 02:56 < rorschach> and it's a lot simpler than trying to calculate what a /32 might be
| |
| − | 02:57 < rorschach> there's also pydbg
| |
| − | 02:57 < rorschach> which I don't use because it's only for windows
| |
| − | 02:57 < rorschach> unfortunately
| |
| − | 02:57 < rorschach> but if you want to write a debugger in python on windows
| |
| − | 02:57 < rorschach> http://wikisecure.net/security/pydbg-an-installation-guide
| |
| − | 02:57 < rorschach> that's a great library
| |
| − | 02:58 < rorschach> they do have ptrace for python though
| |
| − | 02:58 < rorschach> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/ptrace/
| |
| − | 02:58 < rorschach> but basically there are tons of great libraries for python
| |
| − | 02:58 < rorschach> for everything you can imagine
| |
| − | 02:59 < rorschach> those are the useful ones I can think of off teh top of my head
| |
| − | 02:59 < rorschach> but yeah
| |
| − | 02:59 < rorschach> any questions?
| |
| − | 02:59 < rorschach> or did I lose you all? :p
| |
| − | 03:00 < corvus> pretty interesting libraries, encouragement to play around with python more than I have
| |
| − | 03:01 -!- hackerhousemom [[email protected]] has quit [client exited: hackerhousemom] | |
| − | 03:01 < rorschach> yeah they are interesting
| |
| − | 03:01 < rorschach> and they have tons of them too
| |
| − | 03:01 < rorschach> pretty much just google
| |
| − | 03:01 < rorschach> python is annoying as fuck for writing any kind of interfaces though
| |
| − | 03:01 < corvus> Thanks rorschach, glad I made it home intime for this! :3
| |
| − | 03:02 < rorschach> :)
| |
| − | 03:02 < rorschach> np
| |
| − | 03:03 < rorschach> so if there's no more questions I'm gonna go have a smoke
| |
| − | 03:06 < rorschach> by the way
| |
| − | 03:06 < rorschach> scapy is in most repos
| |
| − | 03:07 < rorschach> under scapy or python-scapy
| |
| − | 03:12 < corvus> Thanks again, hope you enjoyed your smoke!! :)
| |
| − | 03:14 <@p00pi3> scapy rules.
| |
| − | 03:15 < rorschach> that i did ^.^
| |
| − | 03:16 <@p00pi3> you wrote scapy?
| |
| − | 03:17 <@p00pi3> i'll have to shake your hand one day. =)
| |
| − | 03:20 < rorschach> o.o
| |
| − | 03:20 < rorschach> no i didn't lol
| |
I am a self-taught programmer, I've been coding for several years now and am decently good at it. I code mainly in C/C++ and Python but know several other languages as well. My current project is a Python fuzzing library, if you're interested in helping, please hit me up on IRC! I hate talking about myself, so if you want to know more hit me up on IRC.
